Mapping Reactivity and Stereochemical Evolution of Benzothiazolium Salts in [3+2] Cycloadditions Using Molecular Electron Density Theory

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29356/jmcs.v70i1.2572

Keywords:

[3+2] cycloaddition reaction, Electron Localization Function, Molecular Electron Density Theory, Bond Evolution Theory, Non-Covalent Interactions

Abstract

The electronic structure of the benzothiazolium salt 1 (1-(cyanomethyl)-2,3-dihydro-1H-benzothiazol-1-ium) and its reactivity in [3+2] cycloaddition (32CA) reactions with dimethyl(Z)-2-butenedioate 2 have been investigated using Molecular Electron Density Theory (MEDT) combined with Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations at the M06-2X/6-311+G(d,p) level. Topological analysis of the Electron Localization Function (ELF) reveals that 1 act as a carbenoid-type three-atom component (TAC), characterized by a carbenoid C3 center. Conceptual DFT reactivity indices identify this TAC as a moderate electrophile and a supernucleophile. The polar 32CA reaction proceeds via a one-step asynchronous mechanism, as revealed by the Bond Evolution Theory (BET), and involves the formation of two stable molecular complexes. The activation barriers are low for both the endo and exo pathways. DFT calculations indicate that the endo pathway is slightly both kinetically and thermodynamically preferred over the exo one, in agreement with experimental findings. Non-covalent interactions (NCIs) analysis attributes this endo selectivity to a combination of weaker attractive interactions and enhanced van der Waals and repulsive interactions in TS-endo, which alleviates steric strain and stabilizes the TS.

 

Resumen. La estructura electrónica de la sal de benzotiazolio 1 (1-(cianometil)-2,3-dihidro-1H-benzotiazol-1-io) y su reactividad en reacciones de cicloadición [3+2] (32CA) con el dimetil (Z)-2-butendioato 2 se investigaron utilizando la Teoría de la Densidad Electrónica Molecular (MEDT) en combinación con cálculos de la Teoría del Funcional de la Densidad (DFT) al nivel M06-2X/6-311+G(d,p). El análisis topológico de la Función de Localización Electrónica (ELF) revela que el compuesto 1 actúa como un componente de tres átomos (TAC) de tipo carbenoide, caracterizado por un centro carbenoide C3. Los índices de reactividad de la DFT conceptual identifican a este TAC como un electrófilo moderado y un supernucleófilo. La reacción polar de cicloadición 32CA transcurre mediante un mecanismo asincrónico de una sola etapa, tal como lo revela la Teoría de la Evolución del Enlace (BET), e implica la formación de dos complejos moleculares estables. Las barreras de activación son bajas tanto para las vías endo como exo. Los cálculos DFT indican que la vía endo está ligeramente favorecida, tanto desde el punto de vista cinético como termodinámico, con respecto a la vía exo, en concordancia con los resultados experimentales. El análisis de las interacciones no covalentes (NCI) atribuye esta selectividad endo a una combinación de interacciones atractivas más débiles y de interacciones de van der Waals y repulsivas más intensas en el estado de transición TS-endo, lo que reduce la tensión estérica y estabiliza dicho estado de transición.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Mohamed Chellegui, ¹University of Sfax  ²University of Namur

1Laboratory of Organic Chemistry (LR17ES08), Faculty of Sciences

2Namur Institute of Structured Matter

Raghad Mowafak Al‑Mokhtar , University of Duhok

Department of Chemistry, College of Science

Raad Nasrullah Salih, Akre University for Applied Science

Nursing Department, Bardarash Technical Institute

Lakhdar Benhamed, University of Tlemcen

Laboratory of Applied Thermodynamics and Molecular Modelling (LAT2M), Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science

Sofiane Benmetir, ⁶Department of Physical CUniversity of Valencia ⁷University of Science and Technology of Oran Mohamed BOUDIAF

6Department of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Valencia, Av. Vicente Andrés Estellés s/n, 46100 Valencia, Spain.

7Process and Environmental Engineering Laboratory (LIPE), Faculty of Chemistry, University of Science and Technology of Oran Mohamed BOUDIAF, P.O. Box 1503, El Mnaouer, 31000 Oran, Algeria.

Jesus Vicente de Julián-Ortiz, University of Valencia

Department of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy

Haydar A. Mohammad-Salim, University of Zakho

8Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science

9TCCG Lab, Scientific Research Center

Ali Ben Ahmed, University of Sfax

10Department of Biomedical, Higher Institute of Biotechnology of Sfax

11Laboratory of Applied Physics, Department of Physics, Faculty of Sciences

References

1. Padwa, A. I.; Pearson, W. H., in: Synthesis Applications of 1,3-Dipolar Cycloaddition Chemistry; Wiley, New York, 1984.

2. Feuer, H. Nitrile Oxides, Nitrones and Nitronates in Organic Synthesis: Novel Strategies in Synthesis; John Wiley & Sons, 2008.

3. Acharjee, N.; Mohammad-Salim, H. A.; Chakraborty, M. Struct. Chem. 2022, 33, 555–570. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1122676/v1

4. Pérez, P.; Domingo, L. R.; Aurell, M. J.; Contreras, R. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 3117–3125.

5. Domingo, L. R.; Saéz, J. A.; Zaragozá, R. J.; Arnó, M. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 8791–8799.

6. Ríos-Gutiérrez, M.; Darù, A.; Tejero, T.; Domingo, L. R.; Merino, P. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017, 15, 1618–1627.

7. Domingo, L. Molecules 2016, 21, 1319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21101319

8. Xiao, Z.; Ding, T.; Mao, S.; Ning, X.; Kang, Y. ChemInform 2016, 47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/chin.201641153

9. Wilson, A. K., in: Frontiers in Computational Chemistry: Volume 5; Bentham Science Publishers, 2020; Vol. 5.

10. Ríos-Gutiérrez, M.; Domingo, L. R. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2019, 2019, 267–282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.201800916

11. Parr, R. G.; Yang, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 4049–4050. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00326a036

12. Yang, W.; Mortier, W. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 5708–5711. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00279a008

13. Domingo, L. R.; Ríos-Gutiérrez, M. Molecules. 2017, 22, 750. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules22050750

14. Wang, Y.; Wei, D.; Zhang, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, Y.; Jia, Y.; Tang, M. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2014, 12, 7503–7514

15. Nasri, L.; Ríos-Gutiérrez, M.; Nacereddine, A. K.; Djerourou, A.; Domingo, L. R. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2017, 136, 1–12

16. Domingo, L. R.; Chamorro, E.; Pérez, P. Lett. Org. Chem. 2010, 7, 432–439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/157017810791824900

17. Domingo, L. R.; Ríos-Gutiérrez, M.; Pérez, P. J. Org. Chem. 2018, 83, 2182–2197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.7b03093

18. Domingo, L. R.; Ríos-Gutiérrez, M.; Acharjee, N. Molecules. 2019, 24, 832. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24050832

19. Parr, R. G.; Yang, W. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1995, 46, 701–728. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pc.46.100195.003413

20. Kohn, W.; Becke, A. D.; Parr, R. G. J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 12974–12980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jp960669l

21. Ayers, P. W.; Parr, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2010–2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ja9924039

22. De Proft, F.; Geerlings, P. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 1451–1464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/cr9903205

23. Geerlings, P.; De Proft, F.; Langenaeker, W. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 1793–1874. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/cr990029p

24. Domingo, L. R.; Ríos-Gutiérrez, M.; Pérez, P. Molecules. 2016, 21, 748. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21060748

25. Bader, R. F. W. Acc. Chem. Res. 1975, 8, 34–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ar50085a005

26. Benallou, A.; Lakbaibi, Z.; El Alaoui El Abdallaoui, H. G. Eur. Rev. Chem. Res. 2018, 5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13187/ercr.2018.2.42

27. Boutiddar, R.; Abbiche, K.; Mellaoui, M. D.; Imjjad, A.; Alahiane, M.; Ait Albrimi, Y.; Marakchi, K.; Mogren Al-Mogren, M.; El Hammadi, A.; Hochlaf, M. J. Comput. Chem. 2024, 45, 284–299. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.27235

28. Becke, A. D.; Edgecombe, K. E. J. Chem. Phys. 1990, 92, 5397–5403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.458517

29. Johnson, E. R.; Keinan, S.; Mori-Sánchez, P.; Contreras-García, J.; Cohen, A. J.; Yang, W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 6498–6506. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ja100936w

30. Domingo, L.; Acharjee, N., in: Molecular Electron Density Theory: A New Theoretical Outlook on Organic Chemistry; 2020; 174–227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2174/9789811457791120050007

31. Krokidis, X.; Noury, S.; Silvi, B. J. Phys. Chem. A 1997, 101, 7277–7282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jp9711508

32. Thom, R., in: Structural Stability and Morphogenesis: An Outline of a General Theory of Models; 1975

33. Woodcock, E. R.; P. T. A. Geometrical Study of Elementary Catastrophes; Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1974

34. Gilmore, R., in: Catastrophe Theory for Scientists and Engineers; 1981

35. Fukui, K. Acc. Chem. Res. 1981, 14, 363–368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ar00072a001

36. Adjieufack, A. I.; Ndassa, I. M.; Patouossa, I.; Mbadcam, J. K.; Safont, V. S.; Oliva, M.; Andrés, J. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 18288–18302. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C7CP01016H

37. Adjieufack, A. I.; Liégeois, V.; Ndassa Mboumbouo, I.; Ketcha Mbadcam, J.; Champagne, B. J. Phys. Chem. A 2018, 122, 7472–7481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpca.8b06711

38. Kraus, G. A.; Nagy, J. O. Tetrahedron 1985, 41, 3537–3545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4020(01)96707-9

39. Zhao, Y.; Truhlar, D. G. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2008, 120, 215–241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-007-0310-x

40. Mohammad-Salim, H.; de Julián-Ortiz, J. V.; Dahlous, K. A.; Islam, M. S.; Almutairi, T. M.; Benmetir, S. Struct. Chem. 2025, 36, 339–350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-024-02373-7

41. Ouled Aitouna, A.; Mohammad-Salim, H.; Zeroual, A.; Syed, A.; Bahkali, A. H.; de Julián-Ortiz, J. V. Comput. Theor. Chem. 2023, 1228, 114283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comptc.2023.114283

42. Tomasi, J.; Mennucci, B.; Cammi, R. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 2999–3094. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/cr9904009

43. Domingo, L. R. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 32415–32428. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA04280H

44. Reed, A. E.; Curtiss, L. A.; Weinhold, F. Chem. Rev. 1988, 88, 899–926. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00088a005

45. Parr, R. G.; Yang, W., in: Density-Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules; Oxford University Press, 1989.

46. Parr, R. G.; Szentpály, L. v.; Liu, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 1922–1924. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ja983494x

47. Parr, R. G.; Pearson, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 7512–7516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00364a005

48. Domingo, L. R.; Chamorro, E.; Pérez, P. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 4615–4624. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jo800572a

49. Reed, A. E.; Weinstock, R. B.; Weinhold, F. J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 83, 735–746. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.449486

50. Pérez, P.; Domingo, L. R.; Duque-Noreña, M.; Chamorro, E. J. Mol. Struct. THEOCHEM. 2009, 895, 86–91. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theochem.2008.10.014

51. Chattaraj, P. K.; Duley, S.; Domingo, L. R. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 2855. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ob06943a

52. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Scalmani, G.; Barone, V.; Petersson, G. A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Li, X.; Caricato, M.; Marenich, A. V.; Bloino, J.; Janesko, B. G.; Gomperts, R.; Mennucci, B.; Hratchian, H. P. Gaussian 16, Revision B.01; 2016. https://gaussian.com/gaussian16/

53. Contreras-García, J.; Johnson, E. R.; Keinan, S.; Chaudret, R.; Piquemal, J.-P.; Beratan, D. N.; Yang, W. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011, 7, 625–632. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ct100641a

54. Lu, T.; Chen, F. J. Comput. Chem. 2012, 33, 580–592. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.22885

55. Noury, S.; Krokidis, X.; Fuster, F.; Silvi, B. Comput. Chem. 1999, 23, 597–604. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0097-8485(99)00039-X

56. https://www.unamur.be/fr/sciences/chimie/recherche/ucpts/lct/drawsuite/drawmol, accessed in September 2024.

57. https://www.unamur.be/fr/sciences/chimie/recherche/ucpts/lct/drawsuite/drawprofile, accessed in September 2024.

58. Chellegui, M.; Al-Mokhtar, R. M.; Salih, R. N.; Benhamed, L.; Benmetir, S.; Vicente de Julián-Ortiz, J.; Mohammad-Salim, H. A.; Ben Ahmed, A. RSC Adv. 2025, 15, 29666–29679. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D5RA04992J

59. Chellegui, M.; Benhamed, L.; Salih, R. N.; Salhi, I.; Benmetir, S.; Ben Ahmed, A.; Mohammad-Salim, H. A.; de Julián-Ortiz, J. V. RSC Adv. 2025, 15, 32271–32283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D5RA04143K

60. Domingo, L. R.; Ríos-Gutiérrez, M.; Pérez, P. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2016, 14, 10427–10436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C6OB01989G

61. Domingo, L. R.; Ríos-Gutiérrez, M.; Pérez, P. Tetrahedron. 2016, 72, 1524–1532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2016.01.061

62. Chellegui, M.; Champagne, B.; Trabelsi, M. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2022, 141, 21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-022-02880-y

63. Chellegui, M.; Adjieufack, A. I.; Trabelsi, M.; Liégeois, V.; Champagne, B. ChemPhysChem 2025, 26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.202400896

64. Chellegui, M.; Koudjina, S.; Salhi, I.; Benmetir, S.; Salih, R. N.; Mohammad-Salim, H. A.; Atohoun, G. Y. S.; de Julián-Ortiz, J. V. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2025, 23, 5016–5032. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D5OB00529A

65. Chellegui, M.; Trabelsi, M.; Champagne, B.; Liégeois, V. ACS Omega 2025, 10, 833–847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.4c07888

66. Chellegui, M.; Benmetir, S.; Salih, R. N.; Mohammad-Salim, H. A.; de Julián-Ortiz, J. V.; Ben Ahmed, A. New J. Chem. 2025, 49, 7302–7313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D5NJ01058F

67. Chellegui, M.; Salhi, I.; Ben Ahmed, A.; Benmetir, S.; Salih, R. N.; Mohammad-Salim, H. A.; de Julián-Ortiz, J. V. Struct. Chem. 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-025-02520-8

68. Benmetir, S.; Chellegui, M.; Benhamed, L.; Al-Mokhtar, R. M.; Salih, R. N.; Algso, M. A.; de Julián-Ortiz, J. V.; Mohammad-Salim, H. A. New J. Chem. 2025, 49, 11191–11202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D5NJ01419K

69. Jaramillo, P.; Domingo, L. R.; Chamorro, E.; Pérez, P. J. Mol. Struct. THEOCHEM. 2008, 865, 68–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theochem.2008.06.022

70. Domingo, L. R.; Ríos-Gutiérrez, M. Sci. Radices 2023, 2, 1–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58332/scirad2023v2i1a01

71. Aurell, M. J.; Domingo, L. R.; Pérez, P.; Contreras, R. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 11503–11509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tet.2004.09.057

72. Domingo, L. R.; Pérez, P.; Sáez, J. A. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 1486–1494. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C2RA22886F

73. Domingo, L. R.; Ríos-Gutiérrez, M., in: Conceptual Density Functional Theory; Wiley, 2022, 481–502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527829941.ch24

74. Boltzmann, L., in: Ableitung Des Stefan’schen Gesetzes, Betreffend Die Abhangigkeit Der Warmestrahlung von Der Temperatur Aus Der Electromagnetischen Lichttheorie, von Ludwig Boltzmann in Graz, 1877

75. Jasiński, R. Chem. Heterocycl. Compd. 2022, 58, 260–262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10593-022-03081-y

76. Domingo, L. R.; Ríos-Gutiérrez, M. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2019, 17, 6478–6488. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C9OB01031A

77. Boto, R. A.; Peccati, F.; Laplaza, R.; Quan, C.; Carbone, A.; Piquemal, J.-P.; Maday, Y.; Contreras-García, J. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2020, 16, 4150–4158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jctc.0c00063

×

Downloads

Published

2026-07-13

Issue

Section

Regular Articles
x

Similar Articles

<< < 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Loading...