A Review of Mexican Contributions to Li₂CuO₂ and its Chemical Modifications as Cathode Materials for Lithium-Ion Batteries

Authors

  • B.A. García-Carrillo Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana – Iztapalapa
  • A de J Martínez Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana – Iztapalapa
  • E. L. Jiménez-Cabañas Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana – Iztapalapa
  • MA Martínez-Cruz Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2532-2829
  • C. Juarez-Yescas University of Illinois Urbana−Champaign https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4509-6547
  • G. Ramos-Sánchez Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana – Iztapalapa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29356/jmcs.v68i4.2294

Keywords:

Li2CuO2, cation doping, anion doping, dual doping, in situ analysis

Abstract

Over the past few decades, battery research has primarily focused on reducing costs and increasing energy density. There have been significant efforts to identify alternative cathode materials that could replace cobalt-based ones, with the goal of finding more environmentally friendly and cost-effective options. In this context, copper-based cathodes have emerged as promising candidates. The appeal of copper-based cathodes lies in their relatively high abundance, particularly in Mexico, their high theoretical energy density, and the potential to enhance their properties by altering their chemical structure. In recent years, numerous research initiatives in Mexico have aimed to make Li2CuO2 cathodes a viable option. This review examines the recent advances and future perspectives of these efforts, with a particular emphasis on the latest attempts to modify the synthesis route and incorporate multiple dopants to create synergistic effects.

 

Resumen. Durante las últimas décadas, la investigación sobre baterías se ha enfocado principalmente en la disminución de costos y el incremento de la densidad energética. Se han realizado importantes esfuerzos para identificar materiales catódicos alternativos que podrían reemplazar a los materiales basados en cobalto, con el objetivo de encontrar opciones rentables y con menor impacto al medio ambiente. En este contexto, los materiales catódicos basados en cobre se han convertido en candidatos prometedores. El interés por los cátodos basados en cobre radica en su abundancia relativamente alta, particularmente en México, su alta densidad energética teórica y la cualidad de mejorar sus propiedades alterando su estructura química. En los últimos años, numerosas propuestas de investigación en México han tenido como objetivo hacer de los cátodos de Li2CuO2 una opción viable. Este resumen recopila los avances recientes y las perspectivas a futuro de estos esfuerzos, con especial énfasis en los últimos intentos de modificar la ruta de síntesis y, a su vez, incorporar múltiples dopantes para crear efectos sinérgicos.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

B.A. García-Carrillo, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana – Iztapalapa

Departamento de Química

A de J Martínez, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana – Iztapalapa

Departamento de Química

E. L. Jiménez-Cabañas, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana – Iztapalapa

Departamento de IPH

MA Martínez-Cruz, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

Instituto de Investigación en Materiales, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México

Centre for Cooperative Research on Alternative Energies (CIC energiGUNE), Basque Research and Technology Alliance (BRTA)

C. Juarez-Yescas, University of Illinois Urbana−Champaign

Department of Chemistry

Materials Research Laboratory, University of Illinois Urbana−Champaign

G. Ramos-Sánchez, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana – Iztapalapa

Departamento de IPH

Laboratorio Nacional Conahcyt de Baterías Ion-Li y Post Li para el diseño y escalamiento de materiales y dispositivos (LNC-BIL-DEMo).

References

Jäger-Waldau A. EPJ Photovoltaics, 2022, 13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/epjpv/2022010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/epjpv/2022010

Summerfield-Ryan O., Park S., Ecological Economics, 2023, 210, 107841. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107841. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107841

Perez M., Perez R., Solar Energy Advances, 2022, 2, 100014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seja.2022.100014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seja.2022.100014

Vivoda V., Bazilian M.D., Khadim A., Ralph N., Krame G., Energy Res Soc Sci, 2024, 108, 103393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.103393

Hoppe R., Rieck H, Zeitschrift für anorganische und allgemeine Chemie, 1970, 379, 2, 157-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.19703790206. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.19703790206

Hoffmann R., Hoppe R., Schäfer W., Zeitschrift für anorganische und allgemeine Chemie, 1989, 578, 1, 18-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.19895780103. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/zaac.19895780103

Sapiña F., Rodríguez-Carvajal J., Sanchis M.J., Ibáñez R., Beltrán A., Beltrán D., Solid State Commun, 1990, 74, 779–784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-1098(90)90934-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-1098(90)90934-4

Prakash A.S., Larcher D., Morcrette M., Hegde M.S., Leriche J., 2005, 74, 4406–4415. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/cm0508266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/cm0508266

Ruther R.E., Samuthira Pandian A., Yan P., Weker J.N., Wang C., Nanda J., Chemistry of Materials, 2017, 29, 2997–3005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b05442. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b05442

Ruther R.E., Zhou H., Dhital C., Saravanan K., Kercher A.K., Chen G., et al., Chemistry of Materials, 2015, 27, 6746–6754. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b02843. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.5b02843

Xu J., Renfrew S., Marcus M.A., Sun M., McCloskey B.D., Tong W., Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2017, 121, 11100–11107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b01799. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b01799

Martínez-Cruz M.A., Yañez-Aulestia A., Ramos-Sánchez G., Oliver-Tolentino M., Vera M., Pfeiffer H., et al., Dalton Transactions, 2020, 49, 4549–4558. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D0DT00273A. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D0DT00273A

Arachi Y., Ide T., Nakagawa T., Nakata Y., ECS Trans, 2012, 50, 143–151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1149/05024.0143ecst. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1149/05024.0143ecst

Perea-Ramírez L.I., Guevara-García A., Galván M., J Mol Model, 2018, 24, 227. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-018-3754-0. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-018-3754-0

Juarez-Yescas C., Oliver-Tolentino M., Ramos-Sánchez G., Vera-Ramirez M.A., Olmedo-González J., Ochoa-Calle A., et al., ACS Appl Energy Mater, 2020, 3, 2771–2780. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.9b02429. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.9b02429

Ramos-Sanchez G., Romero-Ibarra I.C., Vazquez-Arenas J., Tapia C., Aguilar-Eseiza N., Gonzalez I., Solid State Ion, 2017, 303, 89–96. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2017.02.018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2017.02.018

Aguilar-Eseiza N., Ramos-Sánchez G., González F., González I., Electrochem Commun, 2018, 96, 32–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2018.09.002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2018.09.002

Shannon R.D., Acta Crystallographica Section A, 1976, 32, 768–771. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S0567739476001551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1107/S0567739476001563

Mizuno Y., Tohyama T., Maekawa S., Phys Rev B Condens Matter Mater Phys, 1999, 60, 6230–6233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.60.6230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.60.6230

Garcia Carrillo B.A., Estudio de cuprato de litio modificado con iones de metales de transición como cátodo alternativo para baterías de ion litio, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, 2023

Weng Y., Zhang H., Ionics (Kiel), 2024, 30, 1885–1895. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-023-05366-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11581-023-05366-4

He Z., Zhang M., Zhou K., Cheng Y., Luo M., Su Y., et al., ACS Appl Energy Mater, 2023, 6, 3422–3431. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.2c04133. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.2c04133

Ahn H., Choi J., Kim M., Kyu Kang S., Jang D., Maeng J., et al., Chemistry of Materials, 2024, 36, 9, 4379-4392. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c03307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.3c03307

Kong F., Liang C., Longo R.C., Yeon D.H., Zheng Y., Park J.H., et al., Chemistry of Materials, 2016, 28, 6942–6952. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02627. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.6b02627

Kim H., Kim S.B., Park D.H., Park K.W., Energies (Basel), 2020, 13, 4808-4817. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en13184808. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en13184808

Lin Y., Zhong K., Zheng J., Liang M., Xu G., Feng Q., et al., ACS Appl Energy Mater, 2021, 4, 9848–9857. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.1c01883. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.1c01883

Dai K., Wu J., Zhuo Z., Li Q., Sallis S., Mao J., et al., Joule, 2019, 3, 518–541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2018.11.014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2018.11.014

Martínez-Cruz M.A., Ramos-Sánchez G., Oliver-Tolentino M., Pfeiffer H., González I., J Alloys Compd, 2022, 923, 166328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.166328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.166328

Zhang Y., Li H., Liu J., Liu J., Ma H., Cheng F., Journal of Energy Chemistry, 2021, 63, 312-319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2021.07.029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2021.07.029

Ryu H.H., Park G.T., Yoon C.S., Sun Y.K., J Mater Chem A Mater, 2019, 7, 18580–18588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TA06402H. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C9TA06402H

Hao Q., Du F., Xu T., Zhou Q., Cao H., Fan Z., et al., Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 2022, 907, 116034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116034. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2022.116034

Goonetilleke D., Mazilkin A., Weber D., Ma Y., Fauth F., Janek J., et al., J Mater Chem A Mater, 2022, 10, 7841–7855. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TA10568J. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D1TA10568J

Zhang F., Zhou X., Fu X., Wang C., Wang B., Liang W., et al., Mater Today Energy, 2021, 22, 100873. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtener.2021.100873. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtener.2021.100873

Li J., Cameron A.R., Li H., Glazier S., Xiong D., Chatzidakis M., et al., J Electrochem Soc, 2017, 164, A1534–A1544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0991707jes. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0991707jes

Balodhi A., Kim M.G., Crystals (Basel), 2024, 14, 288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst14030288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst14030288

Kawamata S., Okuda K., Kindo K., J Magn Magn Mater, 2004, 272–276, 939–940. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2003.12.579. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2003.12.579

Hausbrand R., Cherkashinin G., Ehrenberg H., Gröting M., Albe K., Hess C., et al., Materials Science and Engineering: B, 2015, 192, 3–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2014.11.014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2014.11.014

Minato T., Abe T., Prog Surf Sci, 2017, 92, 240–280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progsurf.2017.10.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progsurf.2017.10.001

Xin F., Zhou H., Chen X., Zuba M., Chernova N., Zhou G., et al., ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, 2019, 11, 34889–34894. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b09696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b09696

Takada K., Ohta N., Zhang L., Fukuda K., Sakaguchi I., Ma R., et al., Solid State Ion, 2008, 179, 1333–1337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2008.02.017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssi.2008.02.017

Li X., Jin L., Song D., Zhang H., Shi X., Wang Z., et al., Journal of Energy Chemistry, 2020, 40, 39–45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2019.02.006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2019.02.006

×

Downloads

Published

2024-09-30
x

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Loading...