Electrostatic Interaction of Proteins Improves the Stability of A Food Powder Enriched with β-Carotene

Authors

  • Ari Gabriel Godínez-Segura Facultad de Ciencias Químicas
  • Samuel Garcia-Diaz Universidad Veracruzana-Región Veracruz
  • Ángeles García-Hernández Facultad de Ciencias Químicas
  • Liliana Alamilla-Beltrán Instituto Politécnico Nacional
  • Laura Acosta Domíngeuz Universidad Veracruzana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29356/jmcs.v70i1.2501

Keywords:

β-carotene, food powder, glass transition temperature, FTIR, water activity

Abstract

The aim of this work was to determine the effect of hydrolyzed marine collagen and soy protein isolate in the stability of protein food powder enriched with β-carotene. Four powders (SPI-0.99:HMC-0.00, SPI-0.74:HMC-0.25, SPI-0.49:HMC-0.50 and SPI-0.00:HMC-0.99) were prepared by freeze-drying with a concentration of 1 % (w/v) of β-carotene, varying the weight fraction of hydrolyzed marine collagen (HMC) and soy protein isolate (SPI). The powders were stored for 3 weeks in a water activity (aw) range from 0.11 to 0.84 at 25 °C and the degradation of β-carotene was determined by UV-vis spectrophotometry. After, it was caried out differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) at aw= 0 and aw= 0.328. Finally, the powders were analyzed by infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) at aw= 0.328 and were determined their technological properties. SPI-0.74:HMC-0.25 presented the highest intensity at 3277 cm-1 (N-H stretching), the highest percentage of β-carotene retention (83.84 %) and the highest glass transition temperature value (Tg=147.57 °C) at aw=0.328. The results showed that there is a greater interaction of marine collagen and soy protein in a specific ratio and water activity, which allows for the preservation of a greater amount of β-carotene.Therefore, the development of this study is an advance in identifying new factors that produce better stability of food powders rich in proteins and antioxidants.

 

Resumen. El objetivo de este trabajo fue determinar el efecto del colágeno marino hidrolizado y del aislado de proteína de soya en la estabilidad de un alimento proteico en polvo enriquecido con β-caroteno. En este trabajo se prepararon cuatro polvos (SPI-0.99:HMC-0, SPI-0.74:HMC-0.25, SPI-0.49:HMC-0.5 and SPI-0:HMC-0.99) mediante liofilización con una concentración de 1 % (p/v) de β-caroteno, variando la fracción en peso de colágeno marino hidrolizado (HMC) y aislado de proteína de soya (SPI). Los polvos se almacenaron durante 3 semanas en un rango de actividad de agua (aw) de 0.11 a 0.84 a 25 °C y la degradación del β-caroteno se determinó por espectrofotometría UV-vis.  Después, se realizó calorimetría diferencia de barrido (DSC) a aw= 0 and aw= 0.328. Finalmente, los polvos fueron analizados por espectroscopia infrarroja (FTIR) a aw= 0.328 y se determinaron sus propiedades tecnológicas. SPI-0.74:HMC-0.25 presentó la mayor intensidad a 3277 cm-1 (estiramiento N-H), el mayor porcentaje de retención de β-caroteno (83.84 %) y el mayor valor de temperatura de transición vítrea (Tg=147.57 °C) a aw=0,328. Los resultados mostraron que existe una mayor interacción del colágeno marino y la proteína de soya en una especifica proporción y actividad de agua, lo que permite conservar una mayor cantidad de β-caroteno, por lo tanto, el desarrollo de este estudio es un avance para identificar nuevos factores que producen una mejor estabilidad de los polvos alimenticios ricos en proteínas y antioxidantes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Samuel Garcia-Diaz, Universidad Veracruzana-Región Veracruz

Facultad de Ciencias Químicas

Liliana Alamilla-Beltrán, Instituto Politécnico Nacional

Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas

References

1. Gupta, I.; Adin, S. N.; Panda, B. P.; Mujeeb, M.; Biotechnol. Appl. Biochem. 2022, 69, 2517–2529. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bab.2301 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bab.2301

2. Boonlao, N.; Ruktanonchai, U. R.; Anal, A. K.; Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces. 2022, 209, 112211. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.112211 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.112211

3. Kim, W.; Wang, Y.; Vongsvivut, J.; Ye, Q.; Selomulya, C.; Food Chem. 2023, 426, 136565. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136565 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.136565

4. Geng, M.; Li, L.; Feng, X.; Xu, J.; Huang, Y.; Teng, F. L.; J. Mol. Liq. 2022, 360, 119511. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2022.119511 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molliq.2022.119511

5. Deng, X. X.; Zhang, N.; Tang, C. H.; J. Sci. Food Agric. 2017, 97, 2230–2237. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8033

6. Li, S.; Liu, Y.; Qin, W.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, D.; Lin, D.; Liu, S.; Huang, Z.; Chen, H. LWT. 2022, 157, 113120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2022.113120

7. Geng, M.; Feng, X.; Wu, X.; Tan, X.; Shang, B.; Huang, Y.; Li, Y.; Food Chem. 2023, 417, 135842. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.135842 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2023.135842

8. Tyug Tan, S.; Shin Tan, S.; Xuan Tan, C.; PharmaNutrition. 2023, 25, 100352. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phanu.2023.100352 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phanu.2023.100352

9. Cui, Q.; S. X.; Food Hydrocoll. 2023, 145, 109110. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.109110 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.109110

10. Feng, Y.; Niu, L.; Sun, C.; Tu, J.; Yu, L.; Xiao, J.; Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2023, 231, 123314. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123314 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.123314

11. Chatterjee, N.; Sukumaran, H. G.; Kumar, P. D.; Ganesan, B.; Ashraf, M.; Anandan, R.; Mathew, S.; Nagarajarao, R. C.; Food Hydrocoll. 2022, 2, 100061. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fhfh.2022.100061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fhfh.2022.100061

12. Han, S. B.; Won, B.; Yang, S. C.; Kim, D. H.; J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2021, 98, 289–297. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2021.03.039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2021.03.039

13. Ucak, I.; Afreen, M.; Montesano, D.; Carrillo, C.; Tomasevic, I.; Simal-Gandara, J.; Barba, F. J.; Mar. Drugs. 2021, 19, 71. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/md19020071 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/md19020071

14. Villalobos-Castillejos, F.; Alamilla-Beltrán, L.; Leyva-Daniel, D. E.; Monroy-Villagrana, A.; Jiménez-Guzmán, J.; Dorantes-Álvarez, L.; Gutiérrez-López, G. F.; Rev. Mex. Ing. Quim. 2017, 16, 221–228 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24275/rmiq/Alim824

15. Li, X.; Wu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, B.; Food Chem. 2020, 315, 126288. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126288 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126288

16. Fongin, S.; Granados, A. E. A.; Harnkarnsujarit, N.; Hagura, Y.; Kawai, K.; J. Food Eng. 2019, 247, 95–103. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2018.11.027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2018.11.027

17. Van Soest, J. J.; Tournois, H.; de Wit, D.; Vliegenthart, J. F. G.; Carbohydr. Res. 1995, 279, 201–214. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0008-6215(95)00270-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-6215(95)00270-7

18. Alvarez-Ossorio, C.; Orive, M.; Sanmartín, E.; Alvarez-Sabatel, S.; Labidi, J.; Zufia, J.; Bald, C. ACS Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 2, 125–135 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsfoodscitech.1c00367 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsfoodscitech.1c00367

19. Chen, F.; Lin, L.; Zhao, M.; Food Hydrocoll. 2023, 138, 108472. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.108472 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.108472

20. Shi, M. C.; Hwang, T. S.; Chou, H. Y.; J. Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 53, 902–908. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13197-015-2057-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-015-2057-z

21. Ma, X.; Yan, T.; Miao, S.; Mao, L.; Liu, D.; Foods. 2022, 11, 2410. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11162410

22. Xu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Wu, X.; Ma, D.; Huang, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Zhang, S.; Li, Y.; Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 261, 129855. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.129855

23. Seow, C.; Cheah, P.; Chang, Y.; J. Food Sci. 1999, 64, 576–581. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1999.tb15088.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1999.tb15088.x

24. Flores-Miranda, G.; Del Toro, G. V.; Yáñez-Fernández, J.; Rev. Mex. Ing. Quim. 2015, 14, 667–680. DOI: https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/620/62043088009.pdf

25. Meister, K.; Paananen, A.; Bakker, H. J.; Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 10804–10807. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cp08325k

26. Cumming, M. H.; Hall, B.; Hofman, K.; Mar. Drugs. 2019, 17, 223. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/md17040223 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/md17040223

27. Cheng, S. L.; Hongshun, Y.; Food Hydrocoll. 2015, 45, 72–82. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.10.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2014.10.021

28. Ji, F.; Liu, H.; Wang, C.; Guo, N.; Shen, Y.; Luo, S.; Jiang, S.; Zheng, Z.; Food Hydrocoll. 2024, 147, 109439. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.109439 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.109439

29. Pei, S.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, F.; J. Food Sci. Technol. 2023, 60, 2286–2295. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13197-023-05756-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-023-05756-6

30. Wang, Y.; Truong, T.; Woodhead Publ. 2017, 153, 172. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100309-1.00007-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100309-1.00007-9

31. Schmid, E. M.; Farahnaky, A.; Adhikari, B.; Savadkoohi, S.; Torley, P. J.; Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2024, 59, 1679–1693. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.16923 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.16923

32. Acosta-Domínguez, L.; Cocotle-Ronzón, Y.; Alamilla-Beltrán, L.; Hernández-Martínez, E.; Food Hydrocoll. 2021, 119, 106871. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106871 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106871

33. Foh, M. B. K.; Wenshui, X.; Amadou, I.; Jiang, Q.; Food Bioprocess Technol. 2012, 5, 2192–2200. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11947-010-0496-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-010-0496-0

34. Awuchi, G. C.; Somtochukwu, V.; Kate, C. IJAAR. 2019, 5, 139–160.

35. Zamorano-Apodaca, J. C.; Olivia, G. S. C.; Carvajal-Millán, E.; Vallejo-Galland, B.; María, S. A. S.; Lugo-Sánchez, M. E.; Food Chem. 2020, 331, 127350. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127350 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.127350

36. Wang, L.; Min, W.; Liu, H. M.; Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 163, 181–190. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.01.069 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.01.069

×

Downloads

Published

2026-07-07

Issue

Section

Regular Articles
x

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Loading...